Some Bizarre Results From Loser Stocks

Two years ago (April 14, 2010) I asked my blog readers to put their heads together to pick the worst stocks they could think of.

I wanted absolute bottom dwellers, stinkers, sulphur reeking pariahs that were destined for bankruptcy or a painful demise.

And my readers responded.

One person’s junk is another person’s treasure, but there’s no denying the public sentiment of most of these stocks.

In total, readers selected 23 of them.

From that date in 2010, the S&P 500 gained 11.3%.


 Our worst (or should I say best) outhouse business predictions were right on the sewage button:

  • Alcoa    -32.51%                                                          
  • AIG    -19.34%                                                                  
  • AOL    -13.71%                                                               
  • Bank of America   – 55.88%
  • Citigroup   -27.63%
  • Ciena   -13.23%
  • Ford  -11%
  • Goodyear Tire and Rubber  – 19.84%
  • Gamestop Corp    -5.87%
  • Nutrisystem   -40.29%
  • Banco Santander     -54.91%
  • USG Corp    -14.15%
  • Zion Bancorp    -18.36%
  • Juniper Networks  -30.81%


But some of the forecasted stinkers went the other way:

  • Kimco Realty   +14.36%
  • Krispe Kreme Doughnuts   +46.52%
  • Eli Lilly & Co.    +8.16%
  • Microsoft    +5.39%
  • News Corp     +24.07%
  • Pfizer    +30.68%
  • Textron     +18.16%


Two bizarre pariah stock stories come from Burger King and ATC Technology Corp.

My readers, who selected these stocks to plummet, didn’t get their wishes when…..

Burger King was taken private at a 46% premium to its share price in 2010.  And if that wasn’t enough:

In a bizarre twist, according to BusinessWeek, Burger King is once again poised to re-enter the stock exchange as a public company.  It might enter the stock market at a premium to its previous premium.  We’ll find out.

Then there’s the hopeful dog, ATC Technology Corp.  Its shareholders earned a 43% premium to its closing share price on July 16th, 2010 during a merger with GENCO Distribution Systems.

Tracking the collective performance of these stocks has become more complicated.  But I’ll continue to do it, and report on the results.

Currently, the “loser’s” portfolio has dropped roughly 4% since April 2010.

It’s falling short of the index—which is up 11%–and the selected top mutual funds my readers selected as benchmarks.  It’s no surprise that only two of these ten actively managed funds are beating the market.

But the losing stock saga could certainly give us unexpected future results.

What about you?  Do you think you could find lousy stocks ahead of time, or could you be foiled by the odd surprise?  Tell me a story.



worlds best value financial advisor

Andrew Hallam

I’m a financial columnist for Canada’s national paper, The Globe and Mail, as well as for AssetBuilder, a financial service firm based in Texas. I’m also the author of Millionaire Teacher: The Nine Rules of Wealth You Should Have Learned in School (2nd Ed. Wiley 2017) and The Global Expatriate’s Guide To Investing: From Millionaire Teacher to Millionaire Expat (Wiley 2015). My mission is to educate, motivate and inspire people on basic retirement planning and best practices for investing, using evidence-based strategies. I'm happy to comment on your questions. However, please read the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and the Comments Policy.

You may also like...

1 Response

  1. Barry says:

    Thanks for the update Andrew

    I wonder how $50k to $100k invested in both would look in comparison also :o)

    If $100 drops 20% you're left with only $80, to get back to your $100 a 25% increase is required and if that same $100 drops 50% you're left with $50, to get back to your $100 though, a 100% increase is needed. As somone wiser than i said "losses are increasingly difficult to recover".

    With regards to the increase in the Index, the DJIA has had a great recovery in comparison to the S&P/ASX 200 (^AXJO).

    There's an interesting link here ref: LICs: Giving Investors a Greater Edge

  2. essential reading for visitors to andrew hallam website

Leave a Reply

By commenting you confirm you have read and that you agree to the conditions set out on the Legal Page, including the Privacy Policy, and Comments PolicyFor your privacy we strongly recommend you do not use your real name. Your email address will not be published but it may show your photo or recognizable image -- if associated with or similar website. It is strongly suggest you do not use a corporate or school email address. We reserve the right not to publish comments that do not meet guidelines. Published comments will not be deleted.